Medion ERAZER X5755 D/C230

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5755 D/C230 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION GA-Z170X-Gaming 7
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '17 at 13:26
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 766 77% 624 Pts	64-Core 752 46% 752 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Elitegroup(1019 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.7% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 50.7 44% 55.7 fps	MRender 76.9 Gravity 53.7 Splatting 70.1 55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-00000 512GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2751 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 441 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 6 (AE) Unknown 99 99 40 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1615 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 56 39 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16693328 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3888 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3779 (F9) Unknown 99 99 3888	125% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 490 Mixed 505 113% 504 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 57.5 195% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 149 153% 250 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 131%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 208 176 6558 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 731 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2637 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 437 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 67 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2975 (C2) HDA temperature 116 108 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.9% Excellent	Read 145 Write 154 Mixed 142 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.29 115% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB 9,100 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 25.6 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 25.9 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5755 D/C230 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

System: Medion ERAZER X5755 D/C230

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN512HMJP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 106%, 425 samples	3x
Samsung SSD 990 1TBNvmeBench 334%, 167 samples	1x
SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,074 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	1x
9905625-065.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 39%, 818 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16