MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883)

Performance Results


Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7883
Motherboard	MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883) (all builds)
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160825
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '17 at 22:27
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 264 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 830 82% 671 Pts	64-Core 1311 81% 1311 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3052 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 190 Parallax 205 152% 194 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 190 Splatting 131 123% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160 1,284 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 223GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 8137913 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 55241869371670 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2673 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 793 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8137913 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8137913 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8137913 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6478 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4437 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4437 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9964	77.6% Very good	Read 500 Write 259 Mixed 311 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 18.4 104% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 83.5 109% 198 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 1,338 Mixed 1,356 380% 1,727 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 39.1 139% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 42.2 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 22.5 68% 137 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 58GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2409 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 498 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2752140443	92.6% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 403 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 31.8 116% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 106 125% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 30GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6270 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2331 (B1) Unknown 99 99 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 455 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20197026652	99% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 494 Mixed 513 114% 508 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 39.3 134% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 120 99% 135 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 29GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1563 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 337 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9926931754	93.1% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 404 Mixed 418 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 38.9 136% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 96.5 86% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 134%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 118GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 234 233 3291 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3027 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4449 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1980 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 798 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2235 (C2) HDA temperature 117 112 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.5% Good	Read 131 Write 107 Mixed 113 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.44 146% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 3334 MHz Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	124% Outstanding	MC Read 49 MC Write 53.3 MC Mixed 41.9 137% 48.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 25.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883) - $250

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	44x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	14x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 5,028 samples	6x
+ + 4x8GBUnknownBench 109%, 462 samples	6x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $1,405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16