Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 03 '17 at 21:10
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 546
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 78
Parallax 70.6
61% 74.4 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 61.8
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 499
Write 462
Mixed 446
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
132% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 109
Mixed 117
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.18
76% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 149
Write 151
Mixed 140
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.22
110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 65.9
Mixed 99.5
70% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 101
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.21
76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
5GB free, PID 05b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 79.7
Write 6.35
Mixed 11.4
27% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.42
4K Write 0.33
69% 4.88 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback