Asrock B85M-GL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B85M-GL  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '17 at 19:17
Run Duration517 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 91
33% 55.6 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 380
47% 361 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 32.7
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 27.9
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 494
Write 398
Mixed 419
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 28.5
93% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.2
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 37.3
40% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
291GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 58.1
Mixed 48.3
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 62%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 2.6
Mixed 3.05
7% 7.83 MB/s
4K Read 6.32
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
24% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 10%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
1GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 42
Write 34
Mixed 22.4
40% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.94
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.44
48% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-049.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-GL Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-GL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $143
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback