Gigabyte GA-P2532N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P2532N (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110420
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '17 at 19:45
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 48.5 39% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 97.8 8-Core 140 15% 119 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 550M 926 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 2532) 2GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 1.34 4% 3.59 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.57 Splatting 3.26 4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 193 172 1316 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2345 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10065 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2312 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 47915 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 284 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 50011 (C2) HDA temperature 98 86 49 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 87 87 9788 (F1) Unknown 200 200 51401631660 (F2) Unknown 200 200 27907790133 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	39.6% Below average	Read 73.2 Write 64.9 Mixed 67.5 52% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.14 37% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSXP 500GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 123GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 9.59 25% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.26 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-052.A00G 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-P2532N

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)