| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
| Memory | 26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160108 |
| Uptime | 6.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 28 '17 at 20:47 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
66.4%
Good
|
58% 101 Pts
|
45% 343 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.56
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
19% 20.1 fps
|
16% 20.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
78%
Very good
|
87% 30.3 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
44% 90.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,208 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 953x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 407x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 413x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 384x |
| Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 286x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |