Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core Duo T2400 187 User benchmarks, average bench 32% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 96.4 1-Core 9.1 2-Core 16.4 36% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 13.4 8-Core 17.6 2% 15.5 Pts	64-Core 15.8 1% 15.8 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 77 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 80 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 987444490	26% Poor	Read 113 Write 99.3 Mixed 98.4 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 9.1 49% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 31.5 DQ Mixed 14 14% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 115%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 125GB 732 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 15.4 Mixed 20.6 26% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.02 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.78 83% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 0.5 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16