Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 08:10
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 110
2-Core 234
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 778
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 142
Parallax 139
105% 137 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 135
Splatting 110
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
144GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 411
Mixed 431
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 23.7
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 76.7
102% 183 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
77GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 478
Write 265
Mixed 272
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 20
87% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 59.4
94% 185 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 404
Mixed 413
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 31.9
109% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 104
131% 235 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73.8
Write 76.4
Mixed 71.1
56% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback