Hp-pavilion WE179AA-ABU s5311uk

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WE179AA-ABU s5311uk (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Narra6
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100210
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 22:27
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51% Above average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 44 2-Core 88.3 44% 68 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 176 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 0403) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 5.81 6% 6.71 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 6 5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3822 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 701 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 121 121 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 66 54 197569544226	27.3% Poor	Read 232 Write 109 Mixed 120 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 5.18 34% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 5.22 12% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 93%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 557GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 60 (03) Spinup time 115 110 7250 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3780 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22988 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3774 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 698 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 317557 (C2) HDA temperature 114 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 8	36.3% Below average	Read 62.8 Write 63.6 Mixed 71.6 50% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.23 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16