Asrock H61M/U3S3

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M/U3S3 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110621
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 18:14
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 174 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 456 48% 386 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 17.8 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 22.4 19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 370 Write 238 Mixed 278 65% 295 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 18 79% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 55.2 69% 124 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 293GB free Firmware: CC47 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 135 Write 144 Mixed 132 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.42 111% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M/U3S3 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M/U3S3

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	42x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	26x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	46x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	20x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 50%, 208 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x
FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GBKingmaxBench 46%, 860 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16