Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 07:58
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 242 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 840 80% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,335 83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 33.1 32% 33.5 fps	MRender 33.6 Gravity 35.7 Splatting 32.8 28% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 2,022 Write 913 Mixed 1,116 296% 1,350 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 43.4 188% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 27.2 90% 195 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 54GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4029489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 102194451852412 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1242 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 779 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 46 107377197091 (C2) HDA temperature 35 46 107377197091 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4029489 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4029489 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4029489 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3000 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1619 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1619 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2102	73.2% Very good	Read 502 Write 183 Mixed 260 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 22 126% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 53.5 58% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 87%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 36GB free Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5563 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 240 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 246 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1245244 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 62 (C2) HDA temperature 63 51 210454904869 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2533 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2222 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1571 (F4) Unknown 100 100 19 (F5) Unknown 100 100 60 (F6) Unknown 100 100 681696	89.1% Excellent	Read 525 Write 425 Mixed 457 104% 469 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 13.6 104% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 14.1 84% 191 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 682GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 125 115 6750 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1116 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 805 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 356 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 139843 (C2) HDA temperature 108 90 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.2% Average	Read 74.7 Write 69.1 Mixed 68.3 53% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.17 43% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 686GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1742 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1186 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 717 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1024 (C2) HDA temperature 105 90 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.1% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 100 Mixed 88.5 72% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.34 131% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 30.1 96% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 25.1 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)