Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1W8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-1W8  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 134
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.97
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JEDOA60B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 57.9
Mixed 39.3
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback