Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	115.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151218
Uptime	19.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '17 at 16:05
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 29 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 70.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 239 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 968 85% 725 Pts	64-Core 2,752 170% 2,752 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1426) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 141 Parallax 137 118% 141 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 139 Splatting 107 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,749 Write 1,515 Mixed 1,391 345% 1,551 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 26.7 95% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 120 129% 215 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310 3,724 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 69GB free Firmware: DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 30446 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 718 (B1) Unknown 97 97 26 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 51 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 524 (F1) Unknown 99 99 51812361916	84.2% Excellent	Read 498 Write 345 Mixed 358 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 22.8 116% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 12.7 60% 137 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 125%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2GB free Firmware: 3B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 25890 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 541 (B1) Unknown 92 92 273 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 51 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 344 (F1) Unknown 99 99 34699476174	61.9% Good	Read 485 Write 203 Mixed 267 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 18.8 74% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 33 58% 123 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 86%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4TB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 100 0 (03) Spinup time 184 100 9800 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6589 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6605 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 100 31 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 100 6557 (C2) HDA temperature 113 111 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 100 0
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 180GB free Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8516 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10195 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 42 42 42890 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 898 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 593 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9600 (C2) HDA temperature 121 91 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.9% Good	Read 144 Write 81.7 Mixed 95.3 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.29 90% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 8x16GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	108% Outstanding	MC Read 56.5 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 40.7 123% 43.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16