| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | ECS A58F2P-M4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20141007 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 25 '17 at 08:05 |
| Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
20.6%
Poor
|
25% 38.9 Pts
|
10% 79.9 Pts
|
4% 71.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
17%
Very poor
|
16% 16 fps
|
18% 22.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
64% 88.1 MB/s
|
109% 0.94 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.1%
Average
|
41% 55.9 MB/s
|
88% 0.72 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
18GB free, PID 0201
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
36% 29 MB/s
|
67% 0.78 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
13% 4.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.07 GB/s
|
15% 261 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A58F2P-M4 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS A58F2P-M4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples | 5x |
| A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples | 4x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $109 |