Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '17 at 04:12
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 198 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 700 63% 529 Pts	64-Core 1,173 73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 115 Parallax 96.2 84% 104 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 95.1 Splatting 101 80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2290 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 524 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 59 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 194 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12633795	102% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 413 Mixed 419 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 43.1 154% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 95.8 98% 159 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 102GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2290 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 516 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 202 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1530828572	102% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 414 Mixed 416 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 41.6 154% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 73.8 92% 164 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
MyDigitalSSD BPX NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB 759 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM04.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,923 Write 580 Mixed 885 246% 1,130 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 20.1 117% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 20.4 30% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 178%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 171 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2411 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 247 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5571 (C2) HDA temperature 118 111 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	87% Excellent	Read 141 Write 162 Mixed 150 114% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.27 110% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 170 4100 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2320 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2279 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 248 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5684 (C2) HDA temperature 118 110 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 74920 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.6% Very good	Read 133 Write 133 Mixed 132 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.28 108% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.5% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 19.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)