Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 635
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 63.5
57% 68.4 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 56.1
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
40GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 346
Mixed 358
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 29.3
140% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 106
131% 234 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 434
Mixed 473
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 44.7
164% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 155
168% 282 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
23GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 494
Mixed 498
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 26.5
140% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 80.6
136% 263 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 35.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 20.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback