HP HPE-410fr

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP HPE-410fr (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '17 at 20:24
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 160 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 42.7 Reflection 34.3 Parallax 40.8 35% 39.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 39.4 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 8448 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 794 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 289 (64) Unknown 100 100 2070912 (65) Unknown 100 100 829920 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 71 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 634 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1273 (B7) Unknown 99 99 19 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 180389543965 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8448 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 8448 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3754 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4587 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3295 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3041 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 8448	38.5% Below average	Read 254 Write 138 Mixed 142 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 6.81 50% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 81.3 DQ Mixed 22.1 45% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 88%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 544GB free Firmware: 2AR2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 33800 (02) Throughput performance 56 56 8607 (03) Spinup time 89 88 3466 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2157 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5715 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 101 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2142 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1661358 (B7) Unknown 252 252 0 (B8) Unknown 252 252 0 (BA) Unknown 252 252 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 33264 (BC) Unknown 252 252 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 55 193274380314 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 359 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 146160 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 193274380314 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 12 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1760	56.1% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 99.9 Mixed 54.6 62% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.38 106% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-410fr Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-410fr

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	1x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 12GBCE80CE80Bench 30%, 3 samples	3x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 018 AE34G1339U2 2C802C80 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 018 AE34G1339U2 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 2 samples	1x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBCE80CE80Bench 29%, 185 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16