Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '17 at 14:05
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 96.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 275 96% 171 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 728 73% 594 Pts	64-Core 756 47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 208 Parallax 184 157% 195 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 187 Splatting 132 123% 151 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11583 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1202 (B1) Unknown 99 99 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17838037775	123% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 482 Mixed 510 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 49.9 184% 69.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 168 178% 294 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 168 4533 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2856 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11531 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1187 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 140240 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.7% Very good	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 120 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.22 98% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 631GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 123 122 6816 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6174 (05) Reallocated sector count 195 195 40 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26485 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3511 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 145 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 697259 (C2) HDA temperature 112 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 160 160 40 (C5) Current pending sector count 192 192 1386 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 61 0	50.2% Above average	Read 93.9 Write 81 Mixed 82.9 65% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.26 74% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 403GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3577 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25155 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2787 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 131 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3445 (C2) HDA temperature 106 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.9% Good	Read 118 Write 122 Mixed 119 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.47 112% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 69%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60 2,404 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 230GB free Firmware: 0303 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 224726124 (03) Spinup time 99 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7136 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 205423433 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 30812 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4309 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BC) Unknown 100 99 19 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 54 454098971 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 274 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 4110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9229 (C2) HDA temperature 27 46 47244640283 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 32 224726124 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	35.2% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 63.9 Mixed 55 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.41 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 37%
17 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 17.7 12% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C16 2x8GB 1,795 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 25.9 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 27.8 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	4,361x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	783x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	342x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,028x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	940x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	893x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	436x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	309x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	228x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	482x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	257x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $966

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16