| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| System | HP 510-p155ur (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 81B4 |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170531 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 24 '17 at 14:00 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | BLR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
69.6%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
43% 323 Pts
|
20% 323 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
HP(103C 82DF) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.7%
Poor
|
24% 29.4 fps
|
25% 31.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
57.8%
Above average
|
71% 94.4 MB/s
|
92% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
70.4%
Very good
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
54% 74.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds