ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2742C14

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2742C14 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170630
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '17 at 12:56
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 91 2-Core 168 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 202 29% 211 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 30.6 28% 30 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 31.3 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0617A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 255 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 452 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 82 (A3) Unknown 100 100 5 (A4) Unknown 100 100 33202 (A5) Unknown 100 100 91 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 31 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3101 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 55836 (F2) Unknown 100 100 77772 (F5) Unknown 100 100 132808	71.8% Very good	Read 509 Write 267 Mixed 353 83% 376 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 28.6 94% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 66.5 65% 106 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169895 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2011 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4252 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 721 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2011 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2011 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 193274642468 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 190 Mixed 166 134% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.24 114% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 278GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 9 6102 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3690 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3039 (05) Reallocated sector count 82 82 255 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10156 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15260 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2077 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 69 2438 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4228 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 66 420282393 (C2) HDA temperature 74 63 453836826 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 772144 (C4) Reallocation count 94 94 255 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 95 23 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 12 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	54% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 93.3 Mixed 86.5 69% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.32 82% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 671 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 15.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback