Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '17 at 19:05
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 195 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 582 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 1,069 66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Lighting 46.9 Reflection 50.7 Parallax 54.5 38% 50.7 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 37.1 34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2100 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 956 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 56 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 261 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13743006280	90.1% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 404 Mixed 415 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 23.3 131% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 61.3 68% 120 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 134%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 23GB free Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4650 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1737 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 63 (AE) Unknown 100 100 317 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4432422896394 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	56.8% Above average	Read 496 Write 193 Mixed 276 70% 322 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 4.44 84% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 3.43 15% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 158GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 81441010 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9981 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 102085280 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16367 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4825 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 93 34360262668 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 656670758 (C2) HDA temperature 38 48 -17179869146 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 22 81441010 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 51582557253359 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3393782633 (F2) Unknown 100 253 339781241	62.6% Good	Read 107 Write 112 Mixed 103 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.48 105% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 16GB-$44 125 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 6GB free, PID 1656 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 114 Write 46.1 Mixed 41.4 72% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.35 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.31 55% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 29.8 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)