Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '17 at 18:27
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 858 76% 645 Pts	64-Core 1,189 74% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 75.4 52% 65.8 fps	MRender 57.4 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 74.5 52% 61.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 238GB free Firmware: X211200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 2172 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2772 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 150 (A9) Unknown 100 100 294 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 74 (AE) Unknown 100 100 139 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 44 188979347488 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 558 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 558 (F1) Unknown 253 253 17467306452 (F2) Unknown 253 253 15802089461 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	75.9% Very good	Read 424 Write 324 Mixed 356 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 15.1 104% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 14.5 63% 143 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 99%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 183 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 228 (A5) Unknown 100 100 30736778 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 217 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 131 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 58 249109479463 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1151052153100 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 439 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1896 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1836 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1913 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	82.9% Excellent	Read 509 Write 449 Mixed 428 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 17.1 113% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 16.1 23% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 610GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 210324552 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2817 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28638664 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3750 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2338 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 72 8590065745 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 505151518 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 380 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7420 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 68719476766 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 21704 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -5974299505323 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5641206848 (F2) Unknown 100 253 177936967894	83.9% Excellent	Read 149 Write 144 Mixed 141 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.25 100% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545025A7E380 250GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 63GB free Firmware: GGEOA7A0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2453 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 4037 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2058 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 178 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 124550 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 197569609756 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.1% Below average	Read 55.8 Write 59.2 Mixed 57.7 43% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2800 C16 Series 2x8GB 1,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 34.1 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 28.7 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)