DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090728
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 22:15
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 102 52% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 257 27% 215 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.28 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 44.1 Parallax 41.4 31% 41 fps	MRender 47.9 Gravity 48.4 Splatting 49.5 40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC1LE04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6267 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3480 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 187 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 694750 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 11417280 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 99 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 443576 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 694750 (F2) Unknown 100 100 562237	40.6% Average	Read 256 Write 168 Mixed 191 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 12.9 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 65.3 DQ Mixed 13.1 18% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 51%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 595GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 164 160 4766 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9962 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20357 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8338 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 780 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9962 (C2) HDA temperature 112 91 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 88.4 Mixed 94.1 74% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.38 113% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 388GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 100 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25790120246 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5729 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11800 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5023 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5733 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5733 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 223339413544 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	63.6% Good	Read 115 Write 107 Mixed 111 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.34 86% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 14.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	313x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5550IntelBench 67%, 1,065 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16