MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170731
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 18:49
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 69.7 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 196 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 767 69% 581 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 114 Parallax 98.6 93% 109 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 99.8 81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1944 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 365 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 49 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4464127859	97.7% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 413 Mixed 416 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 42.3 154% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 86.1 72% 100 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 134 134 25789268238 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7726 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15218 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1745 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7727 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7727 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 214748889126 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.2% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 164 Mixed 159 122% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.24 90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 108%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 132GB free Firmware: 1AA01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 85 85 5410 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11367 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 39568 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3163 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 504496158 (C2) HDA temperature 60 58 672268328 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 17354 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	31.7% Below average	Read 53.5 Write 56.6 Mixed 60.2 43% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.29 90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 112GB free Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7552 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9819 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 52808 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3099 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 5010598 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 98 98 233 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 41 (C2) HDA temperature 112 85 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5010598 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 3	32.2% Below average	Read 38.4 Write 73.5 Mixed 28.9 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.28 77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 26 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 21.6 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $683

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)