Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 17:39
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 229 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 798 74% 617 Pts	64-Core 1,302 81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 195 Parallax 188 136% 183 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 172 Splatting 123 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 19 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 67 141735100443 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 487053246 (F7) Unknown 100 100 15309417 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1429860 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1926 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	77.9% Very good	Read 465 Write 334 Mixed 335 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 24 98% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 45.3 77% 153 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 35.5 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 23.2 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16