Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111020
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 09:32
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 163 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 322 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 26.6 Parallax 33 30% 32.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 33.7 29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Digitazz 120GB SSD 120GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 41GB free Firmware: .170 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.8% Below average	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 104 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 15.3 74% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 15.4 18% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 99%
OCZ VERTEX2 100GB 640 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 17768226 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 34531537063929 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1013 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 115 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 108 99 17768226 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6080 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3264 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3264 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7232	21.9% Poor	Read 195 Write 47.3 Mixed 62.3 22% 102 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 7.37 4K Mixed 6.87 38% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDT721075SLA380 750GB 736 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 264GB free Firmware: ST4OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 109 (03) Spinup time 117 117 30088626538 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12976 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15626 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5204 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 13022 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 13022 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 197569347612 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.5% Average	Read 91.9 Write 80.5 Mixed 88.6 66% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.34 81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 65%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 186GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 496 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 81 81 19635 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26983 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6924 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 399 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19234 (C2) HDA temperature 117 94 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 199 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.7% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 96.1 Mixed 90 71% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.46 100% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	36% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	375x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16