Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 08:31
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 119 54% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 260 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 114 Parallax 95.4 90% 107 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 94.4 Splatting 98.3 79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$99 690 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21294786 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 139388868642393 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1419 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 316 (B1) Unknown 0 0 165 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 32 47 1017910329376 (C2) HDA temperature 32 47 1017910329376 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21294786 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21294786 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21294786 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 68719476736 (E9) Unknown 0 0 37844 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21624 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21624 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12403	41% Average	Read 206 Write 161 Mixed 141 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 8.93 74% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 69.8 DQ Mixed 9.35 17% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 924GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 9 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8566 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3287 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 37369 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1696 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 175 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3111 (C2) HDA temperature 119 103 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	81.8% Excellent	Read 144 Write 141 Mixed 137 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.5 148% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 633GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 152 11083 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1428 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12373 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 975 (10) Unknown 7 193 129654944903 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 142 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1285 (C2) HDA temperature 117 105 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	74.8% Very good	Read 129 Write 131 Mixed 127 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.23 121% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 98%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 440GB free Firmware: SD25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 42986039 (03) Spinup time 95 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7663 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 73230175989 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 30772 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 25 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3403 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 38 (BD) vendor-specific 57 57 43 (BE) vendor-specific 74 50 504758298 (C2) HDA temperature 26 50 34359738394 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 16 14 42986039 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.3% Above average	Read 95.9 Write 86.3 Mixed 79.2 65% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.31 70% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,487 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.5 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16