Asus G73Jw

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 01:32
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	84%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 16.7 2-Core 34 27% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 58.9 8-Core 74 9% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 97.1 6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2042) 1GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Lighting 7.83 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 6.41 6% 7.7 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 8.53 Splatting 8.74 7% 8.98 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 443GB free Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32494 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 963 (B1) Unknown 94 94 219 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 287 (EB) Unknown 99 99 466 (F1) Unknown 99 99 46209185996	42.9% Average	Read 258 Write 234 Mixed 249 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 15.5 56% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 22 DQ Mixed 11.8 11% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19611 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 556 (B1) Unknown 97 97 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 46 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 216 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8138471038	29.1% Poor	Read 248 Write 157 Mixed 171 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 5.62 30% 9.44 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 12.7 DQ Mixed 9.71 8% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 108%
Patriot Memory 64GB 591 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 48GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 16.3 Mixed 15.4 23% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.05 4K Write 0.27 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	88x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	96x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	20x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16