Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130807
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '17 at 00:33
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 519 55% 439 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 126 Parallax 115 100% 121 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 112 Splatting 101 86% 106 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2190 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1268 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 52 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12147781342	66.8% Good	Read 380 Write 304 Mixed 310 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 26.2 102% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 48.1 DQ Mixed 109 64% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 22GB free Firmware: 2.13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 3897306 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 -12017318479368 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4377 (AB) Unknown 0 0 2 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 97 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 2 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 30 128850985088 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3897306 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3897306 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3897306 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7999 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7151 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7151 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23827	41.7% Average	Read 206 Write 140 Mixed 125 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 11.3 67% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 34.3 49% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 377GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 159692280 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3633 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 33350809 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2927 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2221 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65544 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 74 48 437190682 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22384 (C2) HDA temperature 26 52 38654705690 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 51745765983625 (F1) Unknown 100 253 26933012207 (F2) Unknown 100 253 80474763785	64.9% Good	Read 98.5 Write 128 Mixed 96.3 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.18 60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	68x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	46x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	8x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,979 samples	6x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 2,501 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $537

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16