Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 23:43
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 213
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 610
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 995 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 34.7
23% 31.6 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 37.2
25% 29.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 417
Mixed 423
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 28.8
140% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 22.5
43% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 117
Write 89.6
Mixed 63.2
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 4.88
4K Mixed 0.44
169% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
ST750LM0 22 HN-M750MBB 750GB
698GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.7
39% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.32
74% 0.88 MB/s
WDC WD32 00AAKS-00SBA0 320GB
277GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 29.2
37% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $847
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback