Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SAT-F
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 22:03
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 275
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 724
74% 601 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3664) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 44.2
29% 38.4 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 29.5
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 406
Mixed 417
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 47.2
177% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 23.8
100% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
319GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 409
Mixed 415
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 48.9
159% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 127
150% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
120GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 405
Mixed 420
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.9
177% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 26.2
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 174
Mixed 149
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.25
122% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 140
Mixed 132
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.22
91% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
284GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 111
Write 124
Mixed 127
91% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-009.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $627
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback