Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '17 at 22:02
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 758 74% 608 Pts	64-Core 1,013 63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 113 Parallax 97.4 86% 105 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 99.3 Splatting 94 79% 97 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 928GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18407 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 666 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 138 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10392 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 57 184684445731 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9692725087 (F7) Unknown 100 100 302976967 (F8) Unknown 100 100 16904382	91.8% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 397 Mixed 336 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 24.9 124% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 31.5 81% 169 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 104%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 895GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 55 193274904609 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2238867765 (F7) Unknown 100 100 69994571 (F8) Unknown 100 100 10408902 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4411 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	86.6% Excellent	Read 481 Write 334 Mixed 340 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 27 113% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 54.6 102% 207 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 434GB free Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 2,221 Write 1,347 Mixed 1,354 362% 1,641 MB/s	4K Read 58.6 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 51.1 231% 85 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 383 DQ Mixed 215 239% 410 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 254%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 399GB free Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,482 Write 538 Mixed 685 197% 902 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 22 136% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 569 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 51.6 144% 314 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 155%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 254 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 70 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4892709613	120% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 493 Mixed 515 114% 511 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 46.8 172% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 170 178% 294 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 200897481 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 65 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 67267248 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -31061203484398 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 65 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 64 555548705 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1925 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2586 (C2) HDA temperature 33 40 98784247841 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 17 9 200897481 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -39144331935512 (F1) Unknown 100 253 36207534601 (F2) Unknown 100 253 449716730
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 65 55077402 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 65 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 68573860 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -105742094827242 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 65 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 81 81 19 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 572391458 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1616 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2563 (C2) HDA temperature 34 40 94489280546 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 8 6 55077402 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -135467563482899 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40212178371 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1672793181
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$149 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 198 197 9066 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 77 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 281 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 75 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 502 (C2) HDA temperature 120 117 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	63.2% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 96 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.21 96% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 99%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$249 71 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: AV01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 64 57349217 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 67 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 75417675 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 87436944212280 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 67 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 555548705 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2224 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2611 (C2) HDA temperature 33 40 94489280545 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 8 7 57349217 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 24601572671757 (F1) Unknown 100 253 52820557447 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14395527908
Poor: 32% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.3% Outstanding	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 54.4 MC Mixed 30.2 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 10.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16