MSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7519
MotherboardMSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 21:24
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5472
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 85.6
44% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
MSI(1462 2383) 1GB
CLim: 870 MHz, MLim: 1020 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 16.6
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 21.6
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$99
123GB free
Firmware: 609ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 170
Write 88.9
Mixed 108
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 11.3
69% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.2
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 9.67
21% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 243
Write 196
Mixed 200
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 16.1
88% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 16
18% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 118
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
134GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 104
Mixed 96.8
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.3
110% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
33GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 69.4
Mixed 64.6
51% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
25GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 49.7
Write 78.8
Mixed 69.8
50% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.34
92% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
513GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 99.9
Write 95.1
Mixed 65.6
108% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.23
77% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43T-C51 (MS-7519) Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback