Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '17 at 12:43
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 207 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 577 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 40.8 31% 36.1 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 35 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC1LE00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1593 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 235750 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 235750 (F2) Unknown 100 100 333528	41.4% Average	Read 253 Write 164 Mixed 193 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 12.7 55% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 57.1 DQ Mixed 30.1 42% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 695GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 174 2025 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 159 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 184 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 124 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 296 (C2) HDA temperature 109 94 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	95% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 148 Mixed 139 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.35 110% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 109%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 210GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 36.6 Mixed 17.8 37% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.15 56% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 41%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 100GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 59.2 Write 60.1 Mixed 55.7 75% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.23 71% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$65 6,723 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.6% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 19.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	131x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	118x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	14x
16G-D4-2400-MR 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 3,744 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $314

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16