| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150220 |
| Uptime | 34.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 20 '17 at 09:05 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
45% 362 Pts
|
27% 434 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.1
|
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 38.5 fps
|
27% 32.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
72%
Very good
|
99% 444 MB/s
|
67% 25.1 MB/s
|
73% 153 MB/s
|
|
|
||||
|
|
72.5%
Very good
|
90% 120 MB/s
|
76% 0.98 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.1%
Above average
|
52% 18.3 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
41% 96.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SCI/X9SCA Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 3x |
| Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 3x |
| Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $404 |