Asus P5Q SE

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q SE (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090710
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 20:13
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5430 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 76.5 41% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 152 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.57% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 9.81 Parallax 12.3 9% 11 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 13.8 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1779 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 935 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C2) HDA temperature 71 57 184684576797	32.9% Below average	Read 216 Write 123 Mixed 125 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 6.36 55% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 26.8 DQ Mixed 6.34 10% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS5C3015ALA632 1.5TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 180GB free Firmware: ML5OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 110 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34386674074 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4456 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 103 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 144 144 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24927 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1978 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4456 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4456 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 257698562080 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 126 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 104 Mixed 72.9 68% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.29 75% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 33.2 Write 8.43 Mixed 13 19% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.03 21% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 30%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 6377 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 17.8 Mixed 27 31% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.87 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.39 143% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q SE Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	16x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	11x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	42x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	19x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16