ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer NC-V3-772G-747A161TMAKK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer NC-V3-772G-747A161TMAKK (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer VA70_HW
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140307
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 13:52
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4702MQ 21,618 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 459 49% 390 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760M 1,775 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Acer(1025 0781) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8541 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 14.6 10% 12.7 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 11.3 11% 14.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0Q6E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1383 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 27 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 100 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569282084 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 8 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 248 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	55.8% Above average	Read 90.6 Write 104 Mixed 86.1 70% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.18 67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.44% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 7.12 Mixed 5.59 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.43 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.002 28% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.44% Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.75% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 12.5 Mixed 10.5 18% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.49 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.01 21% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.75% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GB 14,177 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback