Asus M50Vn

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus M50Vn (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M50Vn
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 13:29
Run Duration	1124 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5800 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 43.7 34% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 45.4 8-Core 45.5 6% 45.5 Pts	64-Core 45.1 3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9650M-GT 331 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1912) 1GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 0.88 2% 2.52 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB 3,473 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6371 (05) Reallocated sector count 94 94 259 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 787530710 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6377 (BB) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 36 215823220774 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2211 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 338995 (C2) HDA temperature 38 64 73014444070 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 64 50 188343265 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	27.9% Poor	Read 48.8 Write 48.6 Mixed 20.7 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.26 46% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 35%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Read 0.95 Write 0.93 Mixed 0.92 1% 0.93 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.07 6% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M50Vn Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M50Vn

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9650M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 331 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
M4 64GBCrucial $92Bench 55%, 7,336 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16