Lenovo 7074D9M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 7074D9M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111014
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235 3,026 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 150 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 363 39% 311 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6600A 168 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 307A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Lighting 6.43 Reflection 6.38 Parallax 5.16 5% 5.99 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.63 Splatting 5.48 4% 5.28 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel SSDMAEMC080G2L 80GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 17 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17713 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3093 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 114 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1358942 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 6407852 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3427010010 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 85 85 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 19% Great: 36%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 388GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 47 (03) Spinup time 143 141 3850 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7178 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17616 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3090 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 102 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7075 (C2) HDA temperature 106 97 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.2% Good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 107 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.39 99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 332GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 21.2 Mixed 19.6 28% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.13 61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 51%
Seagate Portable 500GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 133GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 21.4 Mixed 11.8 24% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 7074D9M

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)