MSI MS-16K2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GS63VR 6RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16K2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime24.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '17 at 08:27
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 72.8
37% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 224
20% 169 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 11AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.59
6% 8.37 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 50100P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64% Good
Read 455
Write 325
Mixed 353
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 18.7
74% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 56.7
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 36.1
40% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4H0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 72.5
Write 92.4
Mixed 84.9
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.17
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
20GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 128
Write 14.4
Mixed 28
51% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.55
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
75% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16K2 Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16K2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback