Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170830
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 23:35
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 197 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 724 67% 559 Pts	64-Core 1058 66% 1058 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 12 Reflection 16 Parallax 15.5 10% 14.5 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 18 12% 14 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 460GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4332 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2061 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 84 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17882748097	79.9% Very good	Read 514 Write 412 Mixed 419 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 25.1 102% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 73.2 DQ Mixed 16.3 27% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 165 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 124 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 34 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 51 210454773804 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1555347141 (F7) Unknown 100 100 48852481 (F8) Unknown 100 100 10080110 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1945 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	56% Above average	Read 410 Write 334 Mixed 315 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 10.2 62% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 35 DQ Mixed 10 12% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 98%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119 3,343 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 263GB free Firmware: SC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 242511632 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8693 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 18153296 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7256 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3592 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 26 74 (BE) vendor-specific 63 59 622985253 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 353 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9250 (C2) HDA temperature 37 41 55834574885 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.1% Good	Read 119 Write 115 Mixed 111 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.12 63% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 1x8GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 12.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16