Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 21:55
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 134
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 439
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.6
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 38.8
38% 43.6 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.6
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
160GB free
Firmware: MX15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 83.9
Write 46
Mixed 26.9
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.34
85% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA650 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 109
Write 115
Mixed 9.06
56% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.17
51% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
136GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 66.7
Mixed 41.1
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.14
52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 1600 CL10 Series 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback