Asus T100HAN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus T100HAN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100HAN
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 20:54
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 42.6
27% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 77.6
8-Core 81
11% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 80.9
5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1BDD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4308
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 1.94
1% 1.92 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 155
Write 63.7
Mixed 81.9
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 5.67
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 6.38
12% 23.3 MB/s
USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 7.02
Mixed 11.6
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.19
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
1600, 1600 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback