Asus B85M-E/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E/BR (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150414
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 18:40
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 229 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 602 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 5,936 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 0.75 2% 2.35 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 37317629 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 94351841563865 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 755 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 111 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 43 68722294819 (C2) HDA temperature 35 43 68722294819 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 37317629 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 37317629 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 37317629 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8589 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4954 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4954 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15553 (F4) Unknown 98 98 196673608	46.5% Average	Read 494 Write 97.8 Mixed 139 52% 244 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 8.99 60% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 72.4 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 28.3 36% 63 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 73%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 502GB free Firmware: JP4OA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 123 123 25790054708 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1810 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 26829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 678 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1834 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1834 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 193274576934 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	72.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 128 Mixed 15.6 64% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 155GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2850 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 4884 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21797 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2835 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 64 521338911 (C2) HDA temperature 71 60 571670557 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 669126 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	62.3% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 81.3 74% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 409GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 76 Write 80.5 Mixed 21.7 72% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.34 78% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 34GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 114 Write 11.9 Mixed 20.1 42% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.74 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.72 78% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MMXIV 2x8GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 21 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E/BR Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E/BR

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	124x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	106x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	101x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	79x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	54x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	87x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	39x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16