MSI P55-GD65 (MS-7583)

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7583
Motherboard	MSI P55-GD65 (MS-7583) (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100619
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 23:24
Run Duration	1269 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 96.3 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 148 67% 108 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 371 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% MSI(1462 8034) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 20.2 19% 18.7 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 16.9 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 59184862 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -136330851909532 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 5 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 32 81606475801 (C2) HDA temperature 25 32 81606475801 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 59184862 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 59184862 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 59184862 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 158 (EA) Unknown 0 0 163 (F1) Unknown 0 0 163 (F2) Unknown 0 0 189 (F4) Unknown 100 100 131072	37.1% Below average	Read 190 Write 190 Mixed 172 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 10.8 53% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 67.5 DQ Mixed 12.4 19% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 84%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 259GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 159 4991 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7941 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12902 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2872 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 167 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7941 (C2) HDA temperature 122 102 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 16045 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 96.1 Mixed 31.1 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.3 97% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 10GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 169 4308 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4673 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10368 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 962 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 208 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4464 (C2) HDA temperature 121 99 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 23 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.3% Average	Read 94.1 Write 74 Mixed 33.9 49% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.31 90% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 23 Write 7.99 Mixed 11.1 15% 14 MB/s	4K Read 5.26 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 21% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Read 25.9 Write 4.11 Mixed 7.01 12% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.25 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 16% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 4.26 Mixed 6.59 12% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.16 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 26.9 Write 2.72 Mixed 4.33 10% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.72 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 14% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 8%
DISK 8GB 1,051 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Read 7.38 Write 3.46 Mixed 5.25 6% 5.36 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.003 0% 0.01 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P55-GD65 (MS-7583) Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI P55-GD65 (MS-7583)

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	66x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	68x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	66x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16