Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 114 47% 78.1 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 465 41% 350 Pts	64-Core 919 57% 919 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.3% Poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 32 Parallax 38.9 19% 31.5 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 37.1 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.00 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
431 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 51GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	9.67% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 11.8 26% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.004 0% 0.01 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x4GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16