Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 10:03
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 70 2-Core 125 58% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 212 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.9% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 48.9 52% 58.4 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 66.9 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1432 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 178 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 53 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 58 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1650271848	94.4% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 369 Mixed 412 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 40 146% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 67.1 72% 122 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 123GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 202 159 6866 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6231 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 131 131 207503 (C2) HDA temperature 113 106 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.2% Below average	Read 75.5 Write 44 Mixed 55.8 44% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.07 24% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 90GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 684 (03) Spinup time 141 138 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1546 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 13108 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1542 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1956 (C2) HDA temperature 105 98 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.9% Average	Read 88.9 Write 78 Mixed 83.1 63% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.33 86% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.8% Below average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 12.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	12x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	8x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x
1866 CL10 Series 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 63 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16