Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 03:34
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 94 2-Core 164 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 585 55% 456 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 052F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 27.7 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 34.8 23% 30.7 fps	MRender 29.9 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 33.7 25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54 40,725 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0125A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 57 (A3) Unknown 100 100 8 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2023 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 4 (94) Unknown 100 100 1546 (95) Unknown 100 100 62 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 45 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1500 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 45 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9508 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9508 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7990 (F5) Unknown 100 100 32368	69.7% Good	Read 504 Write 340 Mixed 353 88% 399 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 13.6 80% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 13.6 40% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 130 130 21493907747 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 33 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 33 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 146030329887 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 179 Mixed 160 133% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.22 112% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 131GB free Firmware: 0107 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 29.3 Mixed 30 23% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.35 83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 41%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 65GB free Firmware: 0107 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 28.9 Mixed 29.7 23% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.33 80% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB 5,915 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.8% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.6 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	651x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	291x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	277x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	190x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	80x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	170x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	98x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $459

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16