Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '17 at 19:16
Run Duration	410 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 211 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 653 64% 523 Pts	64-Core 786 49% 786 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 148 Parallax 144 120% 146 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 144 Splatting 111 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 424GB free Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8597 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 765 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 140 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10447 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 40 257699545133 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2294705997 (F7) Unknown 100 100 71741079 (F8) Unknown 100 100 109002982	84.4% Excellent	Read 484 Write 399 Mixed 356 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 23 115% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84.9 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 30.2 56% 107 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 272GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8383 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 713 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10574017941	106% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 409 Mixed 424 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 45.5 174% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 45.3 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 116 99% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9523 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 877 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 49 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 167 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31400677389	96.9% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 408 Mixed 415 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 28.7 152% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 45.3 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 26.8 55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 133%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 63GB free Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16377 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1719 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 21 (AE) Unknown 100 100 415 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10427 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 39 261994446891 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 32671432303 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1021501304 (F8) Unknown 100 100 126157787	79.1% Very good	Read 457 Write 347 Mixed 362 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 22.7 115% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 89.1 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 28.7 49% 92.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 104%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 38 Write 36.8 Mixed 18.5 38% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.18 64% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 246GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 28.8 Mixed 8.4 28% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.17 20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 43%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	5.44% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 9.79 Mixed 8.9 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.56 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 18% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.44% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 506 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 44.5 127% 44.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 22.2 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	227x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16