Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '17 at 14:45
Run Duration	420 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 229 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 542 60% 473 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 112 Parallax 87.6 48% 86.1 fps	MRender 91.1 Gravity 93.9 Splatting 79.5 71% 88.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10489 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2324 (B1) Unknown 87 87 264 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 133 (F1) Unknown 99 99 73752502595	43.5% Average	Read 194 Write 177 Mixed 163 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 16.1 78% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 16.5 18% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 10GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6610 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1328 (B1) Unknown 98 98 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 64 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 81 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8778008658	42.8% Average	Read 198 Write 181 Mixed 170 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 15.7 74% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 46.5 DQ Mixed 16.9 19% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 879GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 173 2191 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 659 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3346 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 556 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 63 504430615 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 647 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.7% Excellent	Read 165 Write 122 Mixed 77.4 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.34 141% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 208GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 11953519 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 47548867 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 26058 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4387 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295098370 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 504627230 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 47244640286 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 42 22 11953519 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -28101970980614 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2880972146 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1789383327	43% Average	Read 82.6 Write 67.3 Mixed 24.3 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 38GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 156 8941 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4272 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12612 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1858 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 111 111 268292 (C2) HDA temperature 127 111 25 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 52 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 51 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 54	25.3% Poor	Read 35 Write 52.9 Mixed 35 31% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.11 51% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 6.32 Mixed 9.57 15% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.53 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 1.25 105% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 18%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 21GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 24.6 Mixed 23.7 32% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.75 69% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	455x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	159x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	98x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	28x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	40x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $387

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16